Page Break Problem

I have a problem with the page breaks in the report and the way the data is displayed. There are 2 report containers, the first reaches to the bottom and the second overlaps on top of the first. The second only appears on the last page and the first, if it does not enter the page, causes a jump, but when the table does not exceed a few lines it would not have to make the page break and it does. What I would like it to do is to only make the page break when the first report container contains enough lines that it overlaps on top of the second. By the way, the version of the list&label is 27.

WSGU000052.inv (262.6 KB)

Hi Noemi,

could you try the following, if not already tested by you?

Could you move the table that is in the separate report container in the “main” container, so that every table is in the same container? This could lead to the wanted result and would make the design a bit simpler.

PS: If possible, maybe you can work with only one report container instead of the current three?

With kind regards

Leon

I have already tried that but the problem is that I want the second report container to always appear in the footer regardless of how far the first report container goes(I want them not to overlap one another), which is why I have divided it into 2 containers.

I see. Do you by chance use our Invoice sample as a report base (due to the dummy rectangle)? Could you try out the different linking options, those might help here.

Right click on the first container, click “Object list” and link the first container with the second one. You then could try for example in the settings for the second container the interlink type “Individual size and position adaption” in combination with the “Vertical interlink” setting “Vertical” → “To end”.

This might result in a configuration that gets to behaviour you want.

More information on that topic is available here: https://docu.combit.net/designer/en/#!Documents/theindividualsizeandpositionadaptations.htm The information is updated for the current List & Label, but the basic descriptions should be the same or at least similar.